↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating risks associated with transport of the ghost shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis as live bait

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating risks associated with transport of the ghost shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis as live bait
Published in
Marine Biology, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00227-007-0884-9
Authors

Bruno Pernet, Aimee Deconinck, Angela Llaban, James W. Archie

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 11%
Brazil 2 7%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 21 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 33%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 74%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2010.
All research outputs
#3,500,524
of 12,226,093 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#702
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,562
of 275,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.