| Title |
Evaluating risks associated with transport of the ghost shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis as live bait
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-007-0884-9 |
| Authors |
Bruno Pernet, Aimee Deconinck, Angela Llaban, James W. Archie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 10% |
| Brazil | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 70% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,907
of 156,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.