↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the utility of organo-polyoxometalate hybrids to inhibit SOX transcription factors

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the utility of organo-polyoxometalate hybrids to inhibit SOX transcription factors
Published in
Cell Regeneration, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2045-9769-3-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamesh Narasimhan, Kevin Micoine, Emmanuel Lacôte, Serge Thorimbert, Edwin Cheung, Bernold Hasenknopf, Ralf Jauch

Abstract

SOX transcription factors constitute an attractive target class for intervention with small molecules as they play a prominent role in the field of regenerative biomedicine and cancer biology. However, rationally engineering specific inhibitors that interfere with transcription factor DNA interfaces continues to be a monumental challenge in the field of transcription factor chemical biology. Polyoxometalates (POMs) are inorganic compounds that were previously shown to target the high-mobility group (HMG) of SOX proteins at nanomolar concentrations. In continuation of this work, we carried out an assessment of the selectivity of a panel of newly synthesized organo-polyoxometalate hybrids in targeting different transcription factor families to enable the usage of polyoxometalates as specific SOX transcription factor drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 32%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Chemical Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#108
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,122
of 240,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.