↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Neurochemical Research, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Neurochemical Research, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020992418511
Authors

Elysia M. Hollams, Keith M. Giles, Andrew M. Thomson, Peter J. Leedman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 32%
Researcher 20 26%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Unspecified 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2009.
All research outputs
#3,542,336
of 12,329,095 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#286
of 1,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,546
of 270,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,329,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.