↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous Regression of an Intracranial Aneurysm Following Remote Aneurysm Clipping: Evaluation with High-Resolution Vessel Wall MRI

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Spontaneous Regression of an Intracranial Aneurysm Following Remote Aneurysm Clipping: Evaluation with High-Resolution Vessel Wall MRI
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00270-017-1864-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanghyeon Kim, Myongjin Kang, Jeonghyun Jo, Dongwon Kim

Abstract

Spontaneous regression of an unruptured aneurysm is very rare. We present a case of a 64-year-old woman with an unruptured cerebral aneurysm in which spontaneous regression occurred after contralateral clipping. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging showed that the aneurysm had decreased in size and there was no evidence of thrombus. Level of Evidence Case, Level IV.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,011,608
of 12,770,714 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#718
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,406
of 273,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#32
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,770,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.