↓ Skip to main content

Flax cultivation and textile production in Neolithic wetland settlements on Lake Constance and in Upper Swabia (south-west Germany)

Overview of attention for article published in Vegetation History & Archaeobotany, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Flax cultivation and textile production in Neolithic wetland settlements on Lake Constance and in Upper Swabia (south-west Germany)
Published in
Vegetation History & Archaeobotany, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00334-011-0300-8
Authors

Ursula Maier, Helmut Schlichtherle

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Denmark 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 9 50%
Social Sciences 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,735,720
of 12,768,104 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History & Archaeobotany
#81
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,763
of 273,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History & Archaeobotany
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,768,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.