| Title |
Understanding the faculty perspectives influencing their innovative practices in MOOCs/SPOCs: a case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-017-0086-6 |
| Authors |
Ada Freitas, Joaquín Paredes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 40% |
| Portugal | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 40 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,827,607
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#125
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,102
of 334,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.