↓ Skip to main content

Quasi-Normal Modes of Stars and Black Holes

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 150)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
1451 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Quasi-Normal Modes of Stars and Black Holes
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, September 1999
DOI 10.12942/lrr-1999-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kostas D. Kokkotas, Bernd G. Schmidt

Abstract

Perturbations of stars and black holes have been one of the main topics of relativistic astrophysics for the last few decades. They are of particular importance today, because of their relevance to gravitational wave astronomy. In this review we present the theory of quasi-normal modes of compact objects from both the mathematical and astrophysical points of view. The discussion includes perturbations of black holes (Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström, Kerr and Kerr-Newman) and relativistic stars (non-rotating and slowly-rotating). The properties of the various families of quasi-normal modes are described, and numerical techniques for calculating quasi-normal modes reviewed. The successes, as well as the limits, of perturbation theory are presented, and its role in the emerging era of numerical relativity and supercomputers is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
China 3 1%
India 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 219 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 26%
Researcher 44 18%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 165 69%
Engineering 5 2%
Mathematics 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 49 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,741,759
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#34
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#792
of 27,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them