↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Autonomous Robots, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
418 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
785 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Published in
Autonomous Robots, January 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008942012299
Authors

Peter Stone, Manuela Veloso

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 785 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 28 4%
United Kingdom 17 2%
Brazil 11 1%
Spain 7 <1%
Portugal 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Colombia 5 <1%
China 5 <1%
Belgium 4 <1%
Other 40 5%
Unknown 657 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 270 34%
Student > Master 162 21%
Researcher 89 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 7%
Student > Bachelor 48 6%
Other 164 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 443 56%
Engineering 204 26%
Unspecified 68 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 1%
Other 48 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#10,917,231
of 12,319,743 outputs
Outputs from Autonomous Robots
#390
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,807
of 270,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autonomous Robots
#15
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,319,743 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.