↓ Skip to main content

Bedeutung der Surfactant-Proteine B und D in der Differentialdiagnostik der akuten Dyspnoe

Overview of attention for article published in Medizinische Klinik, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Bedeutung der Surfactant-Proteine B und D in der Differentialdiagnostik der akuten Dyspnoe
Published in
Medizinische Klinik, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00063-010-1100-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claus Lüers, Gerrit Hagenah, Rolf Wachter, Sibylle Kleta, Jens Schaumberg, Sebastian Riedel, Lutz Binder, Klaus Jung, Albrecht Schmidt, Burkert Pieske

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 8 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,557,011
of 9,569,234 outputs
Outputs from Medizinische Klinik
#11
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,671
of 102,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medizinische Klinik
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,569,234 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them