↓ Skip to main content

Ultraviolet Laser Action in Ferromagnetic Zn1−x Fe x O Nanoneedles

Overview of attention for article published in Nanoscale Research Letters, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Ultraviolet Laser Action in Ferromagnetic Zn1−x Fe x O Nanoneedles
Published in
Nanoscale Research Letters, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11671-009-9473-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

HY Yang, SF Yu, SP Lau, TS Herng, M Tanemura

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 62%
Researcher 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 7 54%
Physics and Astronomy 3 23%
Engineering 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,102,751
of 18,804,592 outputs
Outputs from Nanoscale Research Letters
#185
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,066
of 291,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanoscale Research Letters
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,804,592 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them