↓ Skip to main content

The prognostic value of muscle StO2 in septic patients

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
The prognostic value of muscle StO2 in septic patients
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00134-007-0739-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacques Creteur, Tiziana Carollo, Giulia Soldati, Gustavo Buchele, Daniel De Backer, Jean-Louis Vincent

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 93 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Other 39 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 69%
Unspecified 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Engineering 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 4 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2011.
All research outputs
#2,551,609
of 9,541,169 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,075
of 2,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,640
of 101,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#33
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,541,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 58th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.