↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1021206826750
Authors

Hoyoku Nishino, Michiaki Murakoshi, Tsunehiro Ii, Manabu Takemura, Masashi Kuchide, Motohiro Kanazawa, Xiao Yang Mou, Saeri Wada, Mitsuharu Masuda, Yasuhito Ohsaka, Shingo Yogosawa, Yoshiko Satomi, Kenji Jinno

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Unspecified 6 7%
Other 25 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Unspecified 11 13%
Chemistry 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Other 8 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2005.
All research outputs
#3,544,957
of 12,336,133 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#147
of 553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,642
of 271,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,336,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 553 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.