↓ Skip to main content

Pollutants in pet dogs: a model for environmental links to breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Pollutants in pet dogs: a model for environmental links to breast cancer
Published in
SpringerPlus, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-0790-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Sévère, Philippe Marchand, Ingrid Guiffard, Floriane Morio, Anaïs Venisseau, Bruno Veyrand, Bruno Le Bizec, Jean-Philippe Antignac, Jérôme Abadie

Abstract

Invasive breast carcinoma is the most common cancer in women as in non-ovariectomised pet dogs, which are already identified as a valuable spontaneous preclinical model for that disease. Geographical and time trends suggest that environmental factors may play an important role in the etiology and pathogenesis of breast cancer. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) fit perfectly with these trends and are known to interact with hormonal receptors implicated in breast cancer subtyping. The aim of this innovating study was to evaluate the interest of the companion dog model in assessing chemical exposure and breast cancer associations, in order to identify common etiological features with the human disease in a context of comparative oncology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,393,421
of 25,042,800 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#138
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,138
of 363,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#9
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,042,800 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.