Title |
Ocular drug development - Future Directions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Angiogenesis, March 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10456-007-9068-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Sherris |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 34% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,550,598
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Angiogenesis
#191
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,270
of 76,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angiogenesis
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.