↓ Skip to main content

Ocular drug development - Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Angiogenesis, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 217)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 patent


25 Dimensions

Readers on

23 Mendeley
Ocular drug development - Future Directions
Published in
Angiogenesis, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10456-007-9068-y
Pubmed ID

David Sherris

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 48%
Other 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Unspecified 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2011.
All research outputs
of 9,451,379 outputs
Outputs from Angiogenesis
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 100,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angiogenesis
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,451,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 58th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them