↓ Skip to main content

ConceptNet — A Practical Commonsense Reasoning Tool-Kit

Overview of attention for article published in BT Technology Journal, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
23 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
545 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
427 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
ConceptNet — A Practical Commonsense Reasoning Tool-Kit
Published in
BT Technology Journal, October 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:bttj.0000047600.45421.6d
Authors

H Liu, P Singh

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
Japan 7 2%
Portugal 5 1%
Brazil 5 1%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Spain 4 <1%
China 4 <1%
Mexico 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 339 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 136 32%
Researcher 72 17%
Student > Master 62 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 6%
Student > Bachelor 24 6%
Other 107 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 321 75%
Engineering 26 6%
Unspecified 22 5%
Linguistics 15 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 2%
Other 34 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,453,160
of 13,429,053 outputs
Outputs from BT Technology Journal
#6
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,644
of 270,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BT Technology Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,429,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them