↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Physical Activity Interventions on Anthropometric Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Prevention, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Physical Activity Interventions on Anthropometric Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Journal of Prevention, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10935-014-0352-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki S. Conn, Adam Hafdahl, Lorraine J. Phillips, Todd M. Ruppar, Jo-Ana D. Chase

Abstract

Considerable research has tested physical activity (PA) interventions to prevent and treat overweight and obesity. This comprehensive meta-analysis synthesized the anthropometric effects of supervised exercise interventions and motivational interventions to increase PA. Eligible intervention studies included healthy participants with reported anthropometric outcomes [e.g., body mass index (BMI)]. Extensive searching located 54,642 potentially eligible studies. We included data from 535 supervised exercise and 283 motivational interventions in our syntheses, which used random-effects analyses. Exploratory moderator analyses used meta-analytic analogues of ANOVA and regression. We synthesized data from 20,494 participants in supervised exercise and 94,711 undergoing motivational interventions. The overall mean effect sizes (ES, d) for treatment versus control groups in supervised exercise interventions were 0.20 (treatment vs. control within-group comparison) and 0.22 (between-group comparison). The ES of 0.22 represents a post-intervention BMI of 26.7 kg/m(2) for treatment participants relative to 27.7 kg/m(2) for controls. The corresponding mean ES for motivational interventions was significantly smaller (d = 0.09 for between group, d = 0.10 for treatment vs. control within-group). Control group within-group comparisons revealed slightly worsening anthropometric outcomes during study participation (d = -0.03 to -0.04). Moderator analyses identified potential variables for future research. These findings document significant improvements in anthropometric effects from both supervised exercise and motivational interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Sports and Recreations 15 13%
Psychology 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 31 27%