| Title |
Synthesis of Directional Sources Using Wave Field Synthesis, Possibilities, and Limitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ADS, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2007/90509 |
| Authors |
E. Corteel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 23 | 59% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,448,088
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#3,583
of 25,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,397
of 166,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#72
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.