↓ Skip to main content

Multicast Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Comparative Survey and Taxonomy

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Multicast Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Comparative Survey and Taxonomy
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, August 2009
DOI 10.1155/2009/764047
Authors

Osamah S. Badarneh, Michel Kadoch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
Malaysia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Thailand 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 29%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 39 67%
Engineering 9 16%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#104
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,444
of 114,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.