| Title |
Succinic acid production by a newly isolated bacterium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology Techniques, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10529-008-9806-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edzard Scholten, Dirk Dägele |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,863,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#45
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,377
of 97,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.