Title |
Low temperature cultivation — A step towards process optimisation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Methods in Cell Science, February 1994
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00762385 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ralf Weidemann, Andreas Ludwig, Gerlinde Kretzmer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 30% |
Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#60
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,120
of 72,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.