↓ Skip to main content

Canephron® N in the treatment of recurrent cystitis in women of child-bearing Age: a randomised controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Canephron® N in the treatment of recurrent cystitis in women of child-bearing Age: a randomised controlled study
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40816-017-0046-7
Authors

Maksim Sabadash, Alexander Shulyak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Other 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Psychology 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,910,305
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#5
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,130
of 310,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them