↓ Skip to main content

Use of in-vitro experimental results to model in-situ experiments: bio-denitrification under geological disposal conditions

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Use of in-vitro experimental results to model in-situ experiments: bio-denitrification under geological disposal conditions
Published in
SpringerPlus, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaoru Masuda, Hiroshi Murakami, Yoshitaka Kurimoto, Osamu Kato, Ko Kato, Akira Honda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 40%
Engineering 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,495,840
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#941
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,236
of 198,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#45
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.