↓ Skip to main content

Putting transitivity to the test: a review of the Sydney and Cardiff models

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Linguistics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Putting transitivity to the test: a review of the Sydney and Cardiff models
Published in
Functional Linguistics, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40554-018-0056-x
Authors

Leanne Victoria Bartley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Lecturer 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 29 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 26 39%
Arts and Humanities 7 11%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 27 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,787,589
of 24,317,326 outputs
Outputs from Functional Linguistics
#30
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,511
of 335,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Linguistics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,317,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.