RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @XavierBazin2: Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité…
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @wargonm: Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
Le mec a fait science po (science pipeau pour les connaisseurs )mais explique la médecine a 2 reanimateurs reconnus.
RT @XavierBazin2: Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité…
RT @XavierBazin2: Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité…
RT @XavierBazin2: Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité…
RT @XavierBazin2: Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité…
RT @XavierBazin2: Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité…
RT @XavierBazin2: Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité…
Eh tu as vu @StephaneG05 , il paraît que tu es un mandarin Je le savais !!!!! Ça se voit rien qu'à ta tête t'façon ! https://t.co/wPlgSq4csW
@fluidloading Non. Ici, 66 % des recommandations ne reposent sur aucun RCT https://t.co/X7useYrC48
@MrUrben @fluidloading La preuve https://t.co/X7useYrC48
@StephaneG05 @Woodynist @fluidloading Encore raté. 66 % des recommandations ne reposent sur aucun RCT https://t.co/X7useYrC48
RT @XavierBazin2: Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité…
Ce "mandarin" est venu défendre le père Barraud @fluidloading pour réfuter sèchement ma thèse selon laquelle la majorité des pratiques en réa ne reposent PAS sur des essais randomisés. Vérification faite, c'est 66 % https://t.co/X7useYrC48
RT @dr_mattmorgan: It seems the level of evidence for cardiology is not that different than ICU . . . #researchMatters https://t.co/tgzD2Bq…
RT @dr_mattmorgan: It seems the level of evidence for cardiology is not that different than ICU . . . #researchMatters https://t.co/tgzD2Bq…
RT @dr_mattmorgan: It seems the level of evidence for cardiology is not that different than ICU . . . #researchMatters https://t.co/tgzD2Bq…
RT @dr_mattmorgan: It seems the level of evidence for cardiology is not that different than ICU . . . #researchMatters https://t.co/tgzD2Bq…
It seems the level of evidence for cardiology is not that different than ICU . . . #researchMatters https://t.co/tgzD2BqnB8 and https://t.co/Y0SMcf8ZeU
@Matrix_Mania ICM July 2018 @yourICM https://t.co/peBgtvuRES And Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline 2016: only 7 of 93 recommendations based on HQ evidence i.e. 8% :( More research is needed....
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @AndersPerner: Alarmingly few clinical practice recommendations based on high quality evidence in critical care and in other specialitie…
RT @AndersPerner: Alarmingly few clinical practice recommendations based on high quality evidence in critical care and in other specialitie…
RT @AndersPerner: Alarmingly few clinical practice recommendations based on high quality evidence in critical care and in other specialitie…
RT @Matrix_Mania: Wow - only 9% of critical care recommended interventions are based on high quality evidence. Research matters, lots to do…
RT @AndersPerner: Alarmingly few clinical practice recommendations based on high quality evidence in critical care and in other specialitie…
RT @Matrix_Mania: Wow - only 9% of critical care recommended interventions are based on high quality evidence. Research matters, lots to do…
RT @AndersPerner: Alarmingly few clinical practice recommendations based on high quality evidence in critical care and in other specialitie…
RT @Matrix_Mania: Wow - only 9% of critical care recommended interventions are based on high quality evidence. Research matters, lots to do…
RT @drstephenobrien: Great analysis in @BJOGTweets by @chien_patrick @JamesMNDuffy @martinhirsch100 about limitations of #evidencebasedmedi…
Alarmingly few clinical practice recommendations based on high quality evidence in critical care and in other specialities https://t.co/esItFDBK53
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @lasecip: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of #CriticalCare clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidence @yourICM | #ECM https://t.co/eJclEw4brM
Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of #CriticalCare clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidence @yourICM | #ECM https://t.co/kkqG6xITuu
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidence https://t.co/KACjliCtok via @nuzzel
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
Interesting reading reminding us we need high quality #clinicaltrials in #criticalCare. https://t.co/BJ4LeXSB9y
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
@Satigastro no estamos exentos en nuestra área del problema de escaso nivel de evidencia... https://t.co/TxXtJPe5Dm
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
Perhaps guidelines are vetust despite many collegues still consider them as bibles #PedsICU https://t.co/2CbU1Dyvr6
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
ICU pyramid of evidence is built on loose sand: the strongest recommendations based on the weakest evidence. https://t.co/KJ4rfMAkug
Less than 10% of clinical practice guidelines in CCM are based on "grade A" evidence! May be better to describe the remainder as clinical practice opinions... https://t.co/0Mkpq0ZOBS
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
RT @yourICM: Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidenc…
Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidence. .. While the absolute number of strong recommendations increased over time, its percentage decreased over time..why? free link:
Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidence https://t.co/fflsHkICDi #IntCareMed