Title |
Models of the three-dimensional structures of echidna, horse, and pigeon lysozymes: Calcium-binding lysozymes and their relationship with α-lactalbumins
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Protein Journal, August 1994
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01901539 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
K. Ravi Acharya, David I. Stuart, David C. Phillips, Hugh A. McKenzie, Carmel G. Teahan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
Professor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,695,700
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Protein Journal
#51
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,435
of 20,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Protein Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them