↓ Skip to main content

The Closeness Problem for Double Effect: A Reply to Nelkin and Rickless

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Value Inquiry, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The Closeness Problem for Double Effect: A Reply to Nelkin and Rickless
Published in
The Journal of Value Inquiry, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10790-016-9554-9
Authors

Joshua Stuchlik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#10,640,025
of 13,370,967 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Value Inquiry
#213
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,599
of 268,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Value Inquiry
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,370,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.