| Title |
A critical review of mobile learning integration in formal educational contexts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-018-0091-4 |
| Authors |
Luís Francisco Mendes Gabriel Pedro, Cláudia Marina Mónica de Oliveira Barbosa, Carlos Manuel das Neves Santos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 9 | 15% |
| Portugal | 7 | 11% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 70% |
| Scientists | 14 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 558 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 78 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 37 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 94 | 17% |
| Unknown | 211 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 97 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 64 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 45 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 4% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 90 | 16% |
| Unknown | 227 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#803,545
of 25,046,944 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#21
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,295
of 339,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,944 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.