↓ Skip to main content

Lie-algebraic classification of effective theories with enhanced soft limits

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Lie-algebraic classification of effective theories with enhanced soft limits
Published in
arXiv, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/jhep05(2018)076
Authors

Mark P. Bogers, Tomáš Brauner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 67%
Physics and Astronomy 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,464,908
of 12,942,974 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#134,372
of 488,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,522
of 270,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#8,725
of 25,332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,942,974 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488,370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25,332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.