Cloned and non-cloned Java methods: a comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, December 2017

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 3 X users
facebook: 1 Facebook page

wikipedia: 1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation: 9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 28 Mendeley

Summary X Facebook Wikipedia Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 5 X posts from 3 X users, with an upper bound of 7,589 followers.

RT @emsejournal: Cloned and non-cloned Java methods: a comparative study. Vaibhav Saini, Hitesh Sajnani, Cristina Lopes https://t.co/w0I3sW…

25 Apr 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

Cloned and non-cloned Java methods: a comparative study. Vaibhav Saini, Hitesh Sajnani, Cristina Lopes https://t.co/w0I3sWeGdF

25 Apr 2019

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @emsejournal: Study of 3562 open src Java projects show that methods w cloned (copy-pasted) code is on avg 18% smaller than non-cloned m…

08 Apr 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @emsejournal: Study of 3562 open src Java projects show that methods w cloned (copy-pasted) code is on avg 18% smaller than non-cloned m…

12 Mar 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

Study of 3562 open src Java projects show that methods w cloned (copy-pasted) code is on avg 18% smaller than non-cloned methods. Few other differences in metrics. #onlinefirst Dec 17 https://t.co/q9HFzLvj32

12 Mar 2018

Reply Repost Favourite