↓ Skip to main content

Gender Bias in Studies for FDA Premarket Approval of Cardiovascular Devices

Overview of attention for article published in Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Gender Bias in Studies for FDA Premarket Approval of Cardiovascular Devices
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12170-014-0389-2
Authors

Sanket S. Dhruva, Esme B. Cullen, Rita F. Redberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2015.
All research outputs
#10,396,845
of 13,037,911 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
#114
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,994
of 275,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,037,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.