↓ Skip to main content

The intriguing history of the human calvaria: sinister and religious

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The intriguing history of the human calvaria: sinister and religious
Published in
Child's Nervous System, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00381-007-0509-0
Authors

R. Shane Tubbs, Marios Loukas, Mohammadali M. Shoja, Nihal Apaydin, E. George Salter, W. Jerry Oakes

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 78%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2008.
All research outputs
#3,498,544
of 12,220,104 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#120
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,425
of 270,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,220,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.