↓ Skip to main content

The intriguing history of the human calvaria: sinister and religious

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
The intriguing history of the human calvaria: sinister and religious
Published in
Child's Nervous System, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00381-007-0509-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Shane Tubbs, Marios Loukas, Mohammadali M. Shoja, Nihal Apaydin, E. George Salter, W. Jerry Oakes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#298
of 2,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,981
of 156,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.