↓ Skip to main content

Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
519 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy
Published in
Diabetologia, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00125-008-1157-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. M. Nathan, J. B. Buse, M. B. Davidson, E. Ferrannini, R. R. Holman, R. Sherwin, B. Zinman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Computer Science 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,583,227
of 12,388,051 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,631
of 3,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,085
of 264,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#27
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,388,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.