↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020561122764
Authors

Wayne L. Nicholson, Patricia Fajardo-Cavazos, Roberto Rebeil, Tony A. Slieman, Paul J. Riesenman, Jocelyn F. Law, Yaming Xue

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Sudan 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 17 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 59%
Unspecified 8 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Other 5 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2007.
All research outputs
#3,538,333
of 12,321,517 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#252
of 1,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,882
of 266,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#14
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,321,517 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.