@ShriramKMurthi @hanielmbarbosa Not a reference, but [0] discusses translating CIC into FOL, where the translation is unsound. Proof reconstruction just looks at the premises that the ATP used in its proof and runs those premises through a (simpler) Coq ta
RT @scottfleischman: Some interesting papers by Łukasz Czajka: 2019: First-order guarded coinduction in Coq https://t.co/0rNRgfgiYF 2018:…
RT @scottfleischman: Some interesting papers by Łukasz Czajka: 2019: First-order guarded coinduction in Coq https://t.co/0rNRgfgiYF 2018:…
RT @scottfleischman: Some interesting papers by Łukasz Czajka: 2019: First-order guarded coinduction in Coq https://t.co/0rNRgfgiYF 2018:…
Some interesting papers by Łukasz Czajka: 2019: First-order guarded coinduction in Coq https://t.co/0rNRgfgiYF 2018: Hammer for Coq: Automation for Dependent Type Theory https://t.co/fL3gIF2L5W An infinitary rewriting interpretation of coinductive types
Hammer for Coq: automation for dependent type theory. ~ Ł. Czajka, C. Kaliszyk https://t.co/NHTtR5hrLj #ITP #Coq