↓ Skip to main content

Ladder limit for correlators of Wilson loops

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Ladder limit for correlators of Wilson loops
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/jhep05(2018)168
Authors

Diego H. Correa, Pablo Pisani, Alan Rios Fukelman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#9,767,575
of 12,746,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#6,396
of 12,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,532
of 272,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#313
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,746,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.