↓ Skip to main content

Gender Nonconformity and Psychological Distress in Lesbians and Gay Men

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Gender Nonconformity and Psychological Distress in Lesbians and Gay Men
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9108-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Christopher Skidmore, Joan A. W. Linsenmeier, J. Michael Bailey

Abstract

Some lesbians and gay men tend to be more gender nonconforming, on average and for certain traits, than their heterosexual counterparts. Gender nonconformity in childhood has also been linked to adult homosexuality. Studies of both lesbians and gay men also find elevated rates of psychological distress. We hypothesized that these facts may be related. Individuals who violate social norms for gender-appropriate behavior may suffer from stigmatization by both heterosexual and homosexual people, leading to higher levels of psychological distress. We examined whether several measures of gender nonconformity were related to psychological distress in a community-based sample of gay men and lesbians. These included self-reports of childhood and adulthood gender nonconformity, as well as observer ratings of current behavior. Several measures of gender nonconformity were related to each other for both lesbians and gay men. In addition, gender nonconformity was related to psychological distress, but only for gay men. Finally, both lesbian and gay male participants reported more positive attitudes towards gender conformity than nonconformity, although the pattern was somewhat different for each group. We discuss the implications of these results for future studies of gender nonconformity and for the promotion of psychological health in lesbians and gay men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 178 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 33 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 13%
Student > Master 16 9%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 87 46%
Social Sciences 33 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 34 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,586,550
of 25,393,071 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,438
of 3,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,920
of 78,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#15
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.