↓ Skip to main content

Eosinophilic Pustular Folliculitis

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Eosinophilic Pustular Folliculitis
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, January 2004
DOI 10.2165/00128071-200405030-00007
Authors

Elliot Ellis, Noah Scheinfeld

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Other 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Unspecified 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2010.
All research outputs
#2,256,242
of 12,744,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#91
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,231
of 274,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,744,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.