↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammalian Evolution, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, January 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1009417831601
Authors

Lori Marino, Mark D. Uhen, Bruno Frohlich, John Matthew Aldag, Caroline Blane, David Bohaska, Frank C. Whitmore, Jr.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 6%
Chile 4 4%
United States 4 4%
Argentina 2 2%
Mexico 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 86 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 26%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 65%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 14%
Environmental Science 10 9%
Unspecified 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 6 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,538,198
of 12,321,014 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#107
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,880
of 266,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,321,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.