↓ Skip to main content

Harmonia + and Pandora +: risk screening tools for potentially invasive plants, animals and their pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Harmonia + and Pandora +: risk screening tools for potentially invasive plants, animals and their pathogens
Published in
Biological Invasions, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10530-015-0843-1
Authors

Bram D’hondt, Sonia Vanderhoeven, Sophie Roelandt, François Mayer, Veerle Versteirt, Tim Adriaens, Els Ducheyne, Gilles San Martin, Jean-Claude Grégoire, Iris Stiers, Sophie Quoilin, Julien Cigar, André Heughebaert, Etienne Branquart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 7%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Mexico 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 23 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 32%
Student > Master 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 71%
Environmental Science 5 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#914,922
of 4,800,224 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#153
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,864
of 169,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,800,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.