| Title |
Harmonia+ and Pandora+: risk screening tools for potentially invasive plants, animals and their pathogens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-015-0843-1 |
| Authors |
Bram D’hondt, Sonia Vanderhoeven, Sophie Roelandt, François Mayer, Veerle Versteirt, Tim Adriaens, Els Ducheyne, Gilles San Martin, Jean-Claude Grégoire, Iris Stiers, Sophie Quoilin, Julien Cigar, André Heughebaert, Etienne Branquart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Belgium | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,924,625
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#436
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,982
of 367,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.