RT @LauraVMatarranz: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An Updated Systema…
RT @StMarys_Health: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure https://t.co/yf6Q6cW…
Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure https://t.co/yf6Q6cWXnD
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @CVEPLeuven: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in #cardiacrehabilitation. Get yourself updated by our most recent publication: ht…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
RT @GeorgeMetsios: Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An U…
Aerobic Interval slightly better vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An Updated Meta-Analysis https://t.co/uIy9Ru0uDf @exerciseworks @TheBHF @bacpr @worldheartfed @American_Heart
RT @fitmslax: #HIIT Not just for athletes? https://t.co/cnIs4driY8
RT @fitmslax: #HIIT Not just for athletes? https://t.co/cnIs4driY8
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
#cardiology #aerobic interval training https://t.co/mIaPboyA3L
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
"Cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life were equally affected." Would be interested to hear from experts which outcomes are 'most' clinically significant for these poplns; Overall heart function (VO2); ejection fraction; endothelial dysfunction
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @mackinprof: https://t.co/855nSc1XH1 This meta-analysis adds further evidence to the clinically significant larger increase in peak oxy…
Systematic review: more health benefits from high intensity interval exercise vs. steady state in patients with heart disease: https://t.co/3FFSH5fcOS
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @DrFeito: Additional evidence in support of HIIT among patients w CAD https://t.co/PyYKaFoAsT
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
Meta-análisis, ¡2018!: https://t.co/peP5bY1IVU Aeróbico interválico 🆚 entrenamiento continuo ⚠️SUJETOS CON AFECCIONES CARDÍACAS⚠️ HIIT⬇️ ✔️VO2 PEAK ✔️PRIMER UMBRAL ✔️FACTORES DE RIESGO CARDIOVASCULAR ✔️CALIDAD DE VIDA ¡LA EXCUSA DEL TIEMPO PIERDE FUER
Seminar in Adult Fit! This is EXACTLY what we are discussing next week (hint, hint 😉) https://t.co/qboL9fNMHZ
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @mackinprof: https://t.co/855nSc1XH1 This meta-analysis adds further evidence to the clinically significant larger increase in peak oxy…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: https://t.co/855nSc1XH1 This meta-analysis adds further evidence to the clinically significant larger increase in peak oxy…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: https://t.co/855nSc1XH1 This meta-analysis adds further evidence to the clinically significant larger increase in peak oxy…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
Interval training improves fitness more than continuous https://t.co/vPouVvj7qo
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
Retweeted Stuart Phillips, PhD (@mackinprof): Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis https://t.co/oOHrmFFM08 clinically... https://t.co/mTkaFsalu0
RT @mackinprof: Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysi…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
RT @gibalam: Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs…
Additional evidence in support of HIIT among patients w CAD https://t.co/PyYKaFoAsT
Another systematic review & meta-analysis showing clinically significant larger increase in VO2peak after aerobic interval vs continuous training in patients with CAD & CHF. More & larger studies needed re safety & sustainability. https://t
Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with CAD or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis https://t.co/855nSc1XH1 clinically significant larger increase in peak oxygen uptake following aerobic interval training vs. ae
https://t.co/855nSc1XH1 This meta-analysis adds further evidence to the clinically significant larger increase in peak oxygen uptake following aerobic interval training vs.... https://t.co/855nSc1XH1
Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure https://t.co/yf6Q6cWXnD