↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Hydrobiologia, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1016575519015
Authors

Mark I. Stevens, Ian D. Hogg, M. Ann Chapman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 68%
Environmental Science 6 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2011.
All research outputs
#3,547,063
of 12,341,179 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#431
of 2,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,921
of 266,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,341,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.