↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Sediment Application on Nyssa aquatica and Taxodium distichum Saplings

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Sediment Application on Nyssa aquatica and Taxodium distichum Saplings
Published in
Wetlands, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13157-018-1011-z
Authors

Isabel Grandy, Linda Messina, Evelyn Anemaet, Beth A. Middleton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Other 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,907,726
of 13,353,516 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#244
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,306
of 269,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,353,516 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.