| Title |
Quasi-Local Energy-Momentum and Angular Momentum in GR: A Review Article
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Living Reviews in Relativity, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.12942/lrr-2004-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
László B. Szabados |
| Abstract |
The present status of the quasi-local mass-energy-momentum and angular momentum constructions in general relativity is reviewed. First the general ideas, concepts, and strategies, as well as the necessary tools to construct and analyze the quasi-local quantities are recalled. Then the various specific constructions and their properties (both successes and defects) are discussed. Finally, some of the (actual and potential) applications of the quasi-local concepts and specific constructions are briefly mentioned. This review is based on the talks given at the Erwin Schrödinger Institute, Vienna, in July 1997, at the Universität Tübingen, in May 1998, and at the National Center for Theoretical Sciences in Hsinchu and at the National Central University, Chungli, Taiwan, in July 2000. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 31% |
| Researcher | 18 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 48 | 67% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,504,903
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#101
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,074
of 57,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.