↓ Skip to main content

Types of visible variations induced by X-rays inDrosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetics, July 1930
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
314 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Types of visible variations induced by X-rays inDrosophila
Published in
Journal of Genetics, July 1930
DOI 10.1007/bf02984195
Authors

H. J. Muller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 5%
United States 5 3%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 137 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 44%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 5 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 19%
Computer Science 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 5 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,915,151
of 9,075,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetics
#190
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,043
of 245,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,075,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.