Title |
An assessment of multimodal imaging of subsurface text in mummy cartonnage using surrogate papyrus phantoms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Heritage Science, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40494-018-0175-4 |
Authors |
Adam Gibson, Kathryn E. Piquette, Uwe Bergmann, William Christens-Barry, Graham Davis, Marco Endrizzi, Shuting Fan, Sina Farsiu, Anthony Fitzgerald, Jennifer Griffiths, Cerys Jones, Guorong Li, Phillip L. Manning, Charlotte Maughan Jones, Roberta Mazza, David Mills, Peter Modregger, Peter R. T. Munro, Alessandro Olivo, Alice Stevenson, Bindia Venugopal, Vincent Wallace, Roy A. Wogelius, Michael B. Toth, Melissa Terras |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 27 | 45% |
United States | 5 | 8% |
Germany | 3 | 5% |
Australia | 3 | 5% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 42 | 70% |
Scientists | 17 | 28% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 25% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 22% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 11% |
Materials Science | 3 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#912,222
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#35
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,254
of 345,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.