#Clinicalrelevance of the EQ-5D is easily lost in the haze: e.g. #England's great #patientreportedoutcomes program reports both #VisualAnalogueScale & preference-based valuation but the guide suggests preference-based measures for clinical evaluation,
https://t.co/sCzH3WB5w1 We need to get this right.... EQ-5D is NOT a "preference-based instrument". Its descriptive classification MAY be scored using many methods SOME (but not all)of which generate preference weights intended for use in computing QALYs.
RT @stolk_elly: 5L provides more precise measurements than 3L at individual and group levels, both in terms of responses to EQ-5D items and…
RT @stolk_elly: 5L provides more precise measurements than 3L at individual and group levels, both in terms of responses to EQ-5D items and…
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
RT @stolk_elly: 5L provides more precise measurements than 3L at individual and group levels, both in terms of responses to EQ-5D items and…
RT @stolk_elly: 5L provides more precise measurements than 3L at individual and group levels, both in terms of responses to EQ-5D items and…
5L provides more precise measurements than 3L at individual and group levels, both in terms of responses to EQ-5D items and the resultant utilities. https://t.co/K6dapIVF8G
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
EQ5D - 3L vs 5L debate continues. This research suggests increased precision & sensitivity using 5 level instrument @brenjmulhern. Thanks for posting @PECjournal https://t.co/imoyRIRVXy
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
RT @PECjournal: Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
Is the EQ5d-5L really better than the 3L? Head to Head comparison https://t.co/XVhpw5LbhO #openaccess @nancydevlin1
#HealthEconJA Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries https://t.co/VmnM9YHMzi