↓ Skip to main content

Can Adolescents Learn Self-control? Delay of Gratification in the Development of Control over Risk Taking

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
464 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Can Adolescents Learn Self-control? Delay of Gratification in the Development of Control over Risk Taking
Published in
Prevention Science, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11121-010-0171-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Romer, Angela L. Duckworth, Sharon Sznitman, Sunhee Park

Abstract

Recent findings from developmental neuroscience suggest that the adolescent brain is too immature to exert control over impulsive drives, such as sensation seeking, that increase during adolescence. Using a discounting of delayed reward paradigm, this research examines the ability to delay gratification as a potential source of control over risk-taking tendencies that increase during adolescence. In addition, it explores the role of experience resulting from risk taking as well as future time perspective as contributors to the development of this ability. In a nationally representative sample (n = 900) of young people aged 14-22, a structural equation analysis shows that risk taking as assessed by use of three popular drugs (tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol) is inversely related to the ability to delay gratification. The relation is robust across gender, age, and different levels of sensation seeking. In addition, high sensation seekers exhibit dramatic age-related increase in delay of gratification, lending support to the hypothesis that engaging in risky behavior provides experience that leads to greater patience for long-term rewards. The findings support the conclusion that a complete understanding of the development of self-control must consider individual differences not easily explained by universal trends in brain maturation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 3%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 435 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 23%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Researcher 57 12%
Student > Master 53 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 9%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 80 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 229 49%
Social Sciences 51 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 3%
Neuroscience 13 3%
Other 43 9%
Unknown 99 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,200,775
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#131
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,814
of 104,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them