Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, February 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 24 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 7 X posts from 7 X users, with an upper bound of 19,693 followers.

RT @SpringerUrology: Mozafarpour, Norris, Borin and Eisner: The internet may not be the best place for patients to get information about ur…

23 Feb 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @SpringerUrology: Mozafarpour, Norris, Borin and Eisner: The internet may not be the best place for patients to get information about ur…

23 Feb 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @trwherrmann: a nice article of our new EB member #BrianEisner @BEkidneystone @wjurol official journal of the @SIU_urology https://t.co/…

22 Feb 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

a nice article of our new EB member #BrianEisner @BEkidneystone @wjurol official journal of the @SIU_urology https://t.co/xRwYc7amgf

22 Feb 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @SpringerUrology: Mozafarpour, Norris, Borin and Eisner: The internet may not be the best place for patients to get information about ur…

22 Feb 2018

Reply Repost Favourite

Mozafarpour, Norris, Borin and Eisner: The internet may not be the best place for patients to get information about ureteral stents. https://t.co/5iWZqTOVu5