Title |
Airborne laser scanning of natural forests in New Zealand reveals the influences of wind on forest carbon
|
---|---|
Published in |
Forest Ecosystems, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40663-017-0119-6 |
Authors |
David A. Coomes, Daniel Šafka, James Shepherd, Michele Dalponte, Robert Holdaway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#268
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,840
of 450,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.