↓ Skip to main content

The Vestibular System Mediates Sensation of Low-Frequency Sounds in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
The Vestibular System Mediates Sensation of Low-Frequency Sounds in Mice
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10162-010-0230-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gareth P. Jones, Victoria A. Lukashkina, Ian J. Russell, Andrei N. Lukashkin

Abstract

The mammalian inner ear contains sense organs responsible for detecting sound, gravity and linear acceleration, and angular acceleration. Of these organs, the cochlea is involved in hearing, while the sacculus and utriculus serve to detect linear acceleration. Recent evidence from birds and mammals, including humans, has shown that the sacculus, a hearing organ in many lower vertebrates, has retained some of its ancestral acoustic sensitivity. Here we provide not only more evidence for the retained acoustic sensitivity of the sacculus, but we also found that acoustic stimulation of the sacculus has behavioral significance in mammals. We show that the amplitude of an elicited auditory startle response is greater when the startle stimuli are presented simultaneously with a low-frequency masker, including masker tones that are outside the sensitivity range of the cochlea. Masker-enhanced auditory startle responses were also observed in otoconia-absent Nox3 mice, which lack otoconia but have no obvious cochlea pathology. However, masker enhancement was not observed in otoconia-absent Nox3 mice if the low-frequency masker tones were outside the sensitivity range of the cochlea. This last observation confirms that otoconial organs, most likely the sacculus, contribute to behavioral responses to low-frequency sounds in mice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Other 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 26%
Neuroscience 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#119
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,238
of 97,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them